Return to Articles menu | Step 1 | Step 2
| Step 3 | Step 4 | Step 5
| Step 6
Step 2: Think outside-in
To summarise the argument of Step 1 (Be
prepared to change the way you think): our organisations are designed and managed as
top-down hierarchies. It is this very thing the design and management of the work -
that precludes improvement. Thinking outside-in instead of top-down is much more that
running customer surveys; it is to understand the nature of transactions you have with
your customers. If you follow all of the steps in this series, you will discover for
yourself how top-down thinking can actually impede performance. The control, for example,
of costs can actually cause costs to rise. By contrast, the optimisation of flow
working outside-in always reduces costs.
Change
management thinking |
| From.. |
To.. |
Top-down
|
Outside-in |
Figure 1
What is the purpose of your organisation? To
survive and prosper of course. But the question is by what method? Your budgets can only
be used to set targets; they will not help in a discussion of method. In fact if you rely
on budgets as your prima!ry management tool you will engage your peoples ingenuity
in doing what it takes to be seen to make budget, that often means cheating, distorting
and parts winning at the expense of other parts losing. What you
need is everybody working to improve performance and to do that you need the means to
discuss method how well the work works.
Thinking outside-in leads to better methods
Think about it this way. Your customers can
only take their view of you from the transactions they have with you. If those
transactions are positive for your customers they will be likely to come back; if they are
amazing, the customers will tell their friends. If, at every point of transaction you
could understand the value work what matters to the customer and
do that AND ONLY THAT, your service would improve and you would be more efficient. Why?
Because you would have no waste: good service always costs less a concept many
managers struggle with.
When you take an outside-in view of a traditionally designed
(top-down) organisation, you always find an enormous amount of waste that in turn is
associated with poor customer service.
Take, for example, a cable television company. Looked at from
the point of view of its customers, it looks like this:

Managers, taking a top-down view might
think they are wise to squeeze down the costs of sub-contractors who dig up the road. But
go too far and the sub-contractors will focus only on time and cost. When prospective
customers want to get out of their drives how will they be treated? I know a number of
examples where literally hundreds of prospective customers have sworn never to buy from
those ignorant people who dug up the road.
Similarly, targeting installation crews on
the number of installations per day can result in a predictable volume of problem calls
into customer services. In a rush to meet their targets, crews leave jobs unfinished or
untidy and/or the customers dont know how to operate their set-top box. The costs of
the re-work go on other departments budgets. The solution is not to allocate the
costs of re-work to the installation department (a typical but fruitless managerial
response) but to work instead on optimising installation learning what it takes to
install perfectly; causing no customer calls and no re-work.
Moving on to customer services, you often
find enormous amounts of calls caused by failures of the organisation to get
something right. Rude road diggers and poor installations might be two causes; there will
be others like failure to understand the bill or failures to provide expected services.
Rather than see these things for what they are failures of the system and
acting to remove them, you generally find managers in customer services setting
increasingly impossible targets for answering calls and hiring more staff to work on the
phones. The managers of customer services are, like their colleagues in other
functions, trapped by their organisations design.
Working outside-in leads to improvement
When managers learn to think and work
outside-in, the result is always significant improvement in revenue, service and
efficiency. The starting place is the identification of your organisations
transactions with customers. In the next two articles I will show you how to take measures
that help you understand whats happening at the points of transaction and I will
give you some simple principles for working on flow.
In the meantime, if you follow the activity
recommended here, you may also discover for yourself some other problems associated with
top-down management thinking. These problems become evident when you study your
organisation from the outside-in.
Two common examples:
Telling people what to do at the point of
transaction by procedures or other methods. This only works when you can predict
value or what matters to the customers in the customers
terms. When you canno!t which is most often the case the procedures enshrine
waste of various kinds.
Setting service standards or service
guarantees. They appear attractive but in practice focus peoples attention on
meeting the standards or guarantees, which is not the same as responding to what matters
to customers. Sometimes you find extensive standard-setting and controlling bureaucracies
that in practice are adding massive costs and interfering with the organisations
ability to serve its customers.
Customers define value
Customers want service to be customer
shaped - they want to do business with organisations that respond to their particular
needs in ways that suit their particular circumstances. Only by having intimate knowledge
of customers, their attitudes, habits, their work and so on can one start to design
products and services that are truly customer-driven. The best way to begin a
customer-driven transformation is to know the nature of customer demands on your
organisation, to know what value is associated with those demands and to know
how the organisation works with those demands (flow).
Activity
Using the same schema as for the
cable TV company: Draw the transactions between your organisation and your customers.
Now ask yourself:
What do you know about what the
customers experience at each point of transaction?
Taking the inbound transactions
those where customers make demands on you:
What do you know about the TYPE of demands
customers make at each point of transaction?
What do you know about what matters to
customers (the value work) at each point of transaction?
Now go to the points of transaction. Listen
and observe; listen to telephone calls coming in, go out with a delivery person, a
salesman, or anybody who spends time dealing with customers.
At that place look at whats happening
from the customers point of view.
What types of demand do your customers make?
What matters to customers with respect to
each type of demand?
Does what matters to customers
differ by type of demand?
Ask the people who work there - what matters
to customers with respect to each type of demand?
As you work on the activity, keep questioning
How do we know?. To improve for the long term you will need more than opinion
and anecdote, you will need measures that help you predict and control improvements to the
flow of work. I call these capability measures and they will be the subject of
the next article in this series.
This series Six steps to improving
productivity is based on The Vanguard Guide to Understanding Your
Organisation as a System, published by Vanguard Consulting.
Downloaded from www.systemsthinking.co.uk - improve service and cut costs
Return to Articles menu
| Return to top |